Activepieces

Workflow · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Solid workflow automation tool with a clear value proposition — competes well but lacks standout features against rivals.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Quick answer

Activepieces scores 72/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). STEADY (72) because it provides reliable workflow automation with a user-friendly interface and transparent pricing.

Activepieces is a capable workflow automation platform that focuses on enabling users to create automated workflows without heavy coding. Its user interface is straightforward, making it accessible for non-technical users. The core functionality is solid, allowing for the integration of various applications and services. However, it does not offer unique features that significantly differentiate it from competitors like Zapier or Integromat. While it performs well for standard automation tasks, users seeking advanced capabilities or extensive integrations may find better options elsewhere. The transparency in pricing and the presence of a clear call-to-action on the homepage are commendable, but the lack of detailed documentation or advanced features could limit its appeal for power users.

Why STEADY

STEADY (72) because it provides reliable workflow automation with a user-friendly interface and transparent pricing. Not VITAL due to the absence of standout features that set it apart from established competitors, and the potential for users to outgrow its capabilities as their needs evolve.

Public-surface checklist

What it does well

What it fails at

Best for

  • Small to medium businesses looking for straightforward automation solutions
  • Non-technical users wanting to create workflows without coding
  • Teams needing to automate standard tasks quickly
  • Users who prioritize ease of use over advanced functionality

Not recommended for

  • Power users requiring advanced automation features and integrations
  • Enterprises needing robust documentation and support
  • Users looking for unique capabilities that competitors offer
  • Individuals with complex workflow requirements

Pricing & access

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

None — Activepieces does not expose a programmatic interface for agents, limiting its integration potential.

Agent-friendly score: 2/10

Evidence

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Hlido trust score

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/activepieces.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=activepieces)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=activepieces"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/activepieces.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>