What did Hlido score Agnost AI?

Agnost AI scored 78/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Agnost AI

Name: Agnost AI review
Item: Agnost AI
Rating: 78
Author: Hlido Editor

Frameworks & Eval · tested 2026-08-27 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Conversation analytics for production agents that clusters real chats into ranked failure patterns and links every one back to the exact trace — with a live demo you can open without signing up.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Agnost AI → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Agnost AI scores 78/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-27). STEADY (78) because the value proposition is specific and evidence-linked (clusters tie back to the exact conversations and traces), the pricing is fully published with concrete event and retention limits per tier includ Pricing: Free tier · Subscription (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-27

Agnost is answering a question most agent teams cannot currently answer: of the thousands of conversations your agent had this week, which recurring failures are actually costing you users? It auto-clusters conversations into recurring problems ranked by impact, surfaces where users get frustrated and churn begins, flags hallucinations, broken promises and policy violations, and — the part that matters — links every pattern back to the exact conversations and traces behind it. Analytics that cannot show you the underlying evidence are just a chart; the explicit evidence link is what makes this actionable, and it is consistent with how the product presents itself throughout. Two things stand out on the surface. First, the live demo is open with no signup — 'Click any insight in the live demo. No signup needed' — which is a real cost to the vendor and a real gift to a buyer; a product confident enough to be inspected before a form is a product that expects to survive inspection. Second, pricing is published in full across four tiers with concrete event volumes and retention windows (Free at 1,000 events/mo and 7-day retention, Starter $49/mo at 10,000 events and 30 days, Pro $499/mo at 1M events and 90 days, Enterprise custom with self-hosted VPC and audit logs), and the free tier is described as the full product for agents in early production rather than a crippled teaser. Integration is a two-step skill install. The reservations: the $49-to-$499 step is steep with nothing between, self-hosting and audit logs sit behind Enterprise, and the clustering quality — the thing you are actually buying — is demonstrated in a curated demo, not measured. YC backing is a funding signal, not a quality one.

Why STEADY

STEADY (78) because the value proposition is specific and evidence-linked (clusters tie back to the exact conversations and traces), the pricing is fully published with concrete event and retention limits per tier including a usable free tier, and the open no-signup live demo lets a buyer verify the product before giving anything up. Held below the top of the band because clustering quality is shown through a curated demo rather than measured, the $49→$499 pricing step has nothing in between, and self-hosting and audit logs are Enterprise-only.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Catch silent failures fast — See what broke before users leave.'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'START FREE' / 'OPEN LIVE DEMO'
PASS Pricing or access (required) — Four published tiers with concrete event volumes and retention: Free, Starter $49/mo, Pro $499/mo, Enterprise custom
PASS Demo without signup (required) — 'Click any insight in the live demo. No signup needed.'

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-7eb4f7c92697fe06-agnost-ai). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Agnost AI — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

Agnost AI — run screenshot 2 (page_.png) — page_.png

Agnost AI — run screenshot 3 (page_.png) — page_.png

Agnost AI — run screenshot 4 (page_blog.png) — page_blog.png

What it does well

Auto-clusters thousands of conversations into recurring problems ranked by impact rather than raw dashboards
Every pattern links back to the exact conversations and traces behind it — evidence, not just a chart
Live demo is open with no signup, so the product can be inspected before any commitment
Fully published pricing with concrete event volumes and retention windows on every tier
Free tier is presented as the full product for agents in early production, not a crippled teaser
Detects hallucinations, broken promises and policy violations specifically, not generic "quality"
Two-step integration via a published skill install

What it fails at

Clustering and detection quality are demonstrated in a curated demo, not independently measured
Steep pricing gap between Starter ($49/mo, 10k events) and Pro ($499/mo, 1M events) with nothing in between
Self-hosted VPC deployment and audit logs are Enterprise-only, custom-priced
Free-tier retention of 7 days is short for spotting patterns that emerge over weeks
YC backing is a funding signal and says nothing about detection accuracy

Best for

Teams running a conversational agent in production who cannot tell which failures actually matter
Product owners who need failure evidence tied to specific conversations before prioritising a fix
Early-production agents that fit inside the free tier and want the analysis from day one

Not recommended for

Pre-production agents with no real conversation volume yet — there is nothing to cluster
Teams needing self-hosted deployment or audit logs without an Enterprise contract
Mid-volume users whose needs fall awkwardly between the Starter and Pro tiers

Pricing & access

ModelFree tier · Subscription
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented
Price points we recorded…and retention windows (Free at 1,000 events/mo and 7-day retention, Starter $49/mo at 10,000 events and 30 days, Pro $499/mo at 1M events and 90 days, Enterprise…
Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Four published tiers with concrete event volumes and retention: Free, Starter $49/mo, Pro $499/mo, Enterprise custom (tested 2026-08-27)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-27.

Compared to

Langfuse ranked-failure-clustering-vs-full-loop-observability
Langfuse is a broad tracing, prompt-management and evaluation platform across the whole AI engineering loop. Agnost is narrower and downstream: it takes production conversations and clusters them into ranked, evidence-linked failure patterns. Langfuse for full-loop observability; Agnost for "which failures are costing us users".
Helicone conversation-level-failure-analysis-vs-request-level-monitoring
Helicone focuses on LLM request logging, cost and performance monitoring. Agnost operates at the conversation level, clustering user-visible failures and frustration rather than per-request metrics. Helicone for cost and latency; Agnost for user-experience failure analysis.

Agent relevance

CLI SDK Behavioral-testable

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 57/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Integration is a published skill install (`npx skills add AgnostAI/skills --skill agnost-ai`) followed by a prompt that wires analytics into your agent, so the connection path is itself agent-native. Agnost then ingests conversation events from your running agent. It observes agents rather than being called by them — the consumer of its output is a human product owner.

Agent-friendly score: 6/10

Evidence

Auto-clusters conversations into recurring, impact-ranked problems with links to the exact conversations and traces — source (2026-08-27) verified
Live demo is open with no signup required — source (2026-08-27) verified
Published tiers: Free (1,000 events/mo, 7-day retention), Starter $49/mo (10,000 events, 30 days), Pro $499/mo (1M events, 90 days), Enterprise custom with self-hosted VPC and audit logs — source (2026-08-27) verified
Detects hallucinations, broken promises and policy violations with the conversation and trace behind each failure — source (2026-08-27) verified

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 ·

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/agnost.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=agnost)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=agnost"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/agnost.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>