What did Hlido score AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot?

AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot scored 82/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Is AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot reliable?

AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot is rated STEADY (82/100) by Hlido. AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot — An AI-powered custom node for ComfyUI designed to enhance workflow automation and provide intelligent assistance. Repo-surface review: measured from the public repository (5375 stars, MIT, last push 2026-04-07); not hands-on tested.

How much does AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Open source. Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot

Name: AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot review
Item: AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot
Rating: 82
Author: Hlido Editor

Image & Design · tested 2026-07-23 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A mature, MIT-licensed AI copilot for ComfyUI with real traction and a v2 release — but a ~100-day quiet stretch is the signal to watch.

9 PASS · 1 FAIL of 10 public-surface claims

Visit AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot → scorecard.json

Quick answer

AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot scores 82/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-07-23). STEADY (82, repo-surface ceiling). Pricing: Open source (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-07-23

By repository signals this is a credible, adoptable addition to a ComfyUI image pipeline: 5.4k stars, an MIT license, a reached v2.0 release, TypeScript with CI present, and a documented install. It targets a real and popular host (ComfyUI), which grounds its usefulness. The one caution the repo surface raises is momentum — the last push was roughly 100 days ago, just outside the 90-day active-development window, so confirm it still tracks the current ComfyUI before depending on it. Repo-surface read; the quality of the in-canvas assistance itself is not something we tested hands-on.

Why STEADY

STEADY (82, repo-surface ceiling). MIT licensing, a v2.0 release, CI, documented install and strong traction against a popular host clear STEADY. VITAL is withheld because repo signals cannot verify functional quality, and the ~100-day gap since the last push flags cooling momentum.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Repo reachable (required) — GH API 200 for AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot
PASS Readme present (required) — README length 11145
PASS License present (required) — MIT
PASS Install documented (required) — install/usage section found in README
PASS Active 12mo (required) — last push 100d ago
PASS Releases present — latest v2.0
PASS Community traction — 5375 stars
PASS Ci or tests — 1 workflow file(s)
FAIL Recent commit 90d — last push 100d ago
PASS Agent consumable — CLI install line in README

What we saw

1 screenshot captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-92ff746a354c7f7a-github-com). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

AIDC-AI/ComfyUI-Copilot — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

What it does well

MIT-licensed with strong traction (5.4k stars)
Reached a v2.0 release — a maturity signal
CI present and install documented
Targets a real, widely-used host (ComfyUI), grounding its utility

What it fails at

~100 days since last push — momentum cooling, just outside the active-development window
Agent-consumability is via a ComfyUI node, not a general agent interface
Functional quality unverified from the repo surface

Best for

ComfyUI users wanting in-canvas AI assistance
Image/design workflows already standardized on ComfyUI

Not recommended for

Teams needing a guarantee of active maintenance
Non-ComfyUI stacks
Agent pipelines needing a standalone programmatic API

Pricing & access

ModelOpen source
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-07-16.

Related agents

Agent relevance

CLI

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 31/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Runs as a ComfyUI custom node; consumable inside a ComfyUI-hosted workflow rather than as a standalone agent API. No hands-on behavioral test performed.

Agent-friendly score: 4/10

Evidence

— source
— source
— source

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: repo-surface-track+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 ·

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/aidc-ai-comfyui-copilot.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=aidc-ai-comfyui-copilot)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=aidc-ai-comfyui-copilot"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/aidc-ai-comfyui-copilot.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>