What did Hlido score AICOM (AIMarket)?

AICOM (AIMarket) scored 60/100 (FADING) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

How much does AICOM (AIMarket) cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Open source · Usage-based. Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

AICOM (AIMarket)

Name: AICOM (AIMarket) review
Item: AICOM (AIMarket)
Rating: 60
Author: Hlido Editor

Infrastructure · tested 2026-08-05 · re-test due 2026-11-05 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: An ambitious self-hosted agent economy — 13 pipeline agents, 17 signed oracles, a federated marketplace — whose most trustworthy feature is that it labels its own cryptography as prototype.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit AICOM (AIMarket) → scorecard.json

Quick answer

AICOM (AIMarket) scores 60/100 (FADING) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-05). FADING (60) — real technical substance (17 mathematically specified oracles, Ed25519-signed receipts, permissive licensing, genuine self-hosting) and notable intellectual honesty in labelling its own beacon cryptography Pricing: Open source · Usage-based (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-05

AICOM proposes a full open economy for autonomous agents: a 13-agent factory that takes a brief through spec, code, QA, security and deploy; a federated hub where shipped capabilities and oracles are signed, indexed and invokable; and pay-per-call settlement over micropayment channels, all self-hosted under MIT/Apache-2.0 with an explicit "no hosted black box — your keys, your data, your host" stance. Seventeen oracles are listed with real mathematical substance (verifiable randomness, optimal transport, persistent homology, graph spectra, Gaussian-process uncertainty), each with Ed25519-signed receipts and optional post-quantum ML-DSA, alongside 377 passing tests. The single most credible thing on the page is the smallest: the Chronos × Platon beacon is labelled "research/prototype crypto honesty", with post-quantum signing off by default. A project that flags its own cryptography as prototype rather than marketing it as quantum-safe is telling you something true, and it is the reason this scores as high as it does. Everything else argues for caution. The scope — factory, marketplace, protocol, oracles, 3D visualisers, Telegram and Discord bots, YouTube release broadcasting, fleet observability — is enormous for what appears to be a very small team, and breadth at that ratio usually means shallow depth somewhere. It is hosted on GitHub Pages, has no adoption evidence, named users, or third-party audit, and "377 tests green" measures self-authored tests, not correctness. Reviewed from the public surface only.

Why FADING

FADING (60) — real technical substance (17 mathematically specified oracles, Ed25519-signed receipts, permissive licensing, genuine self-hosting) and notable intellectual honesty in labelling its own beacon cryptography as research/prototype with post-quantum signing off by default. Held at FADING because the scope is enormous relative to apparent team size, there is no adoption evidence, no third-party audit, and self-authored passing tests are not independent validation of a system that signs and settles value.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'An open economy for autonomous AI agents.'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'STAR ON GITHUB' / 'TRY THE LIVE DEMO'
PASS Pricing or access — Self-hosted and open source; per-call pricing set by oracle operators
PASS Evidence or demo — Live demo, whitepaper and knowledge base; self-authored tests only, no third-party audit

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-e55770b0316df2f4-alexar76-github-io). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

AICOM (AIMarket) — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

AICOM (AIMarket) — run screenshot 2 (page_flow.png) — page_flow.png

AICOM (AIMarket) — run screenshot 3 (page_oracles.png) — page_oracles.png

AICOM (AIMarket) — run screenshot 4 (page_mcp.png) — page_mcp.png

What it does well

Labels its own Chronos × Platon beacon as research/prototype cryptography rather than marketing it as production-grade
Post-quantum ML-DSA available but off by default — a conservative, correct default
17 oracles with genuine mathematical specificity, each shipping Ed25519-signed receipts
Fully self-hosted and permissively licensed (MIT/Apache-2.0) — no hosted black box, forkable in every part
Coherent compounding loop: factory ships a capability, hub indexes it, next run discovers and reuses it
Verify step is built into the invocation flow — discover, invoke, verify the signed proof, settle

What it fails at

Scope (factory, marketplace, protocol, oracles, 3D visualisers, bots, broadcasting, observability) is enormous relative to apparent team size
No adoption evidence, named users, or production deployments on the public surface
'377 tests green' counts self-authored tests — not independent validation of a value-signing system
No third-party security audit despite cryptographic signing and on-chain settlement being central
Hosted on GitHub Pages with no institutional footprint or stated continuity commitment
Heavy mythological branding (Dioscuri, Helios, Metis, Gaia, Skopos, Chronos, Platon) obscures rather than explains what each component does

Red flags

[object Object]

Best for

Researchers and builders exploring self-hosted, non-custodial agent-to-agent economies
Anyone who needs verifiable-math oracles with signed proofs and is able to audit the code themselves
Teams that require full self-hosting and permissive licensing over managed convenience

Not recommended for

Production systems settling real value — the project labels key cryptography as prototype
Buyers needing an independent security audit before trusting signed receipts
Teams without the capacity to self-host and evaluate a large multi-component stack

Pricing & access

ModelOpen source · Usage-based
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented
Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Self-hosted and open source; per-call pricing set by oracle operators (tested 2026-08-04)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-04.

Related agents

Agent relevance

API MCP SDK

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 64/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Agents are the intended participants: the hub is searchable by intent and price, invocation is pay-per-call over micropayment channels, MCP servers expose the oracles and web tools, and SDKs plus an embed widget cover other consumers.

Agent-friendly score: 8/10

Evidence

13-agent factory taking a brief through spec, code, QA, security and deploy — source (2026-08-05) verified
17 oracles with Ed25519-signed proofs and optional ML-DSA (off by default) — source (2026-08-05) verified
Self-hosted, non-custodial, MIT/Apache-2.0 licensed — source (2026-08-05) verified
Chronos × Platon beacon labelled research/prototype cryptography by the project itself — source (2026-08-05) verified
377 tests green — source (2026-08-05)
Adoption, production deployments, or third-party security audit — source (2026-08-05)

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-11-05

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/alexar76-aimarket-plugins.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=alexar76-aimarket-plugins)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=alexar76-aimarket-plugins"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/alexar76-aimarket-plugins.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>