What did Hlido score attalla1/photopea-mcp-server?

attalla1/photopea-mcp-server scored 80/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Is attalla1/photopea-mcp-server reliable?

attalla1/photopea-mcp-server is rated STEADY (80/100) by Hlido. attalla1/photopea-mcp-server — MCP server for AI-driven image editing with Photopea. Repo-surface review: measured from the public repository (23 stars, MIT, last push 2026-04-05); not hands-on tested.

How much does attalla1/photopea-mcp-server cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Open source. Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

attalla1/photopea-mcp-server

Name: attalla1/photopea-mcp-server review
Item: attalla1/photopea-mcp-server
Rating: 80
Author: Hlido Editor

Image & Design · tested 2026-08-27 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A tidy MIT-licensed MCP server that hands agents Photopea's image-editing surface — genuinely agent-native, but early (23 stars) and quiet for ~5 months.

7 PASS · 3 FAIL of 10 public-surface claims

Visit attalla1/photopea-mcp-server → scorecard.json

Quick answer

attalla1/photopea-mcp-server scores 80/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-27). STEADY (80, repo-surface ceiling). Pricing: Open source (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-27

This is a focused, well-formed piece of agent plumbing: an MCP server that lets an AI agent design posters, edit photos and transform images by driving Photopea, the free browser-based Photoshop alternative. Because it speaks MCP, it is agent-consumable by construction — the checklist confirms it — and it ships MIT-licensed with documented install and tagged releases, which is more release discipline than most tools this size show. The cautions are about maturity and momentum, not design: it has only 23 stars, no CI, and its last push was in early April 2026 — roughly five months quiet — so confirm it still tracks Photopea before depending on it. It is also a thin bridge over a third-party service, so its usefulness is bounded by Photopea's continued availability. Repo-surface read; the editing quality itself was not tested hands-on.

Why STEADY

STEADY (80, repo-surface ceiling). MIT licensing, documented install, tagged releases and — crucially — genuine agent-consumability over MCP clear STEADY. VITAL is withheld because traction is low (23 stars), there is no CI, the repo has been quiet for ~5 months, and editing quality is unverified from the repo surface.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Repo reachable (required) — GH API 200 for attalla1/photopea-mcp-server
PASS Readme present (required) — README length 10240
PASS License present (required) — MIT
PASS Install documented (required) — install/usage section found in README
PASS Active 12mo (required) — last push 102d ago
PASS Releases present — latest v0.1.1
FAIL Community traction — 23 stars
FAIL Ci or tests — no .github/workflows
FAIL Recent commit 90d — last push 102d ago
PASS Agent consumable — MCP server markers in README

What it does well

Genuinely agent-native — exposes image editing to agents over MCP
MIT-licensed with documented install and tagged releases
Clear, narrow scope: drives Photopea, a free browser-based Photoshop alternative
Gives agents an image-editing capability without a paid design API

What it fails at

Low traction (23 stars) and no CI present
Last push ~5 months ago — momentum has cooled
A thin wrapper over third-party Photopea — bounded by that service's availability
Editing quality and reliability unverified hands-on

Red flags

Quiet for ~5 months with no CI — confirm it still tracks Photopea before depending on it

Best for

Agent builders who need an image-editing tool callable over MCP
Workflows wanting programmatic poster/photo edits without a paid design API

Not recommended for

Teams needing an actively-maintained, high-traction dependency
Use cases that cannot tolerate reliance on a third-party (Photopea) surface

Pricing & access

ModelOpen source
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-07-16.

Related agents

Agent relevance

API MCP Behavioral-testable

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 60/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

An MCP server an agent connects to directly to drive Photopea for image editing; agent-consumable by construction. Behaviorally testable via MCP but not run hands-on for this review.

Agent-friendly score: 8/10

Evidence

— source
— source
— source

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: repo-surface-track+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 ·

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/attalla1-photopea-mcp-server.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=attalla1-photopea-mcp-server)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=attalla1-photopea-mcp-server"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/attalla1-photopea-mcp-server.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>