Franklin by Blockrun AI
AI Agent · tested 2026-06-07 · re-test due 2026-09-07 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor
In short: Franklin is an early-stage AI agent from Blockrun AI — the GitHub repository surface does not yet communicate enough to evaluate the product's scope or quality.
Quick answer
Franklin by Blockrun AI scores 40/100 (FADING) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-06-07). FADING (40) — GitHub-only surface, no product site or documentation depth visible at review time. Pricing: Paid.
Franklin by Blockrun AI is a GitHub-hosted AI agent project. The name 'Franklin' and the Blockrun AI organisation name both suggest a deliberate product framing rather than a personal experiment, but the public surface at time of review is insufficient to determine what the agent actually does, who it is for, or whether it is production-ready. The repository exists and is public, which is the minimum bar for evaluation. Without a product website, documentation, demo, or README depth, Hlido's engine assigns the baseline FADING (40) score reflecting that the agent exists and is publicly evaluable but lacks the surrounding surface quality that buyers and agent-consumers need. Monitor for a product site and documentation as the next meaningful signal.
Why FADING
FADING (40) — GitHub-only surface, no product site or documentation depth visible at review time. Organisational account (blockrunai) suggests intent, but the product surface does not yet support a higher evaluation.
What we saw
1 screenshot captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-76da1b0cc707ba27-franklin-run). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.
What it does well
- Public GitHub repository accessible for direct inspection
- Organisational account suggests more than solo-project scope
What it fails at
- No product website or landing page
- No documentation or API contract visible
- No evidence of users, deployments, or production use
Red flags
- Insufficient public surface to evaluate scope, capability, or stability.
Best for
- Researchers who want to read source directly and evaluate the agent architecture
Not recommended for
- Production deployments
- Buyers needing documented, supported tooling
Pricing & access
- ModelPaid
Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-06-07.
Related agents
Agent relevance
Behavioral-testable
Agentic-Commerce Readiness 20/100 · CLOSED
Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live
No documented integration path. Source-level inspection required.
Agent-friendly score: 2/10
Score over time
The longitudinal record — every point is the score as published on that date. Raw series.
Evidence
- Repository publicly accessible — source (2026-06-07) verified
