What did Hlido score Cline (latest)?

Cline (latest) scored 90/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Cline (latest)

Name: Cline (latest) review
Item: Cline (latest)
Rating: 90
Author: Hlido Editor

Coding · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Strong coding assistant with high reliability — excels in code generation but lacks integration depth.

0 PASS · 5 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Cline (latest) → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Cline (latest) scores 90/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). STEADY (90) due to its strong performance in code generation and reliability, but not classified as VITAL due to its lack of integration with other development tools, which could limit its appeal for team-based environme Pricing was not findable on the public surface when tested.

Hlido Editor · 2026-05-23

Cline (latest) stands out as a robust coding assistant, demonstrating a strong ability to generate code snippets and assist with programming tasks efficiently. Its high score of 90 reflects a solid performance that many developers can rely on for quick coding solutions. However, while it excels in generating code, it shows limitations in integration with broader development environments or workflows, which may hinder its utility for teams looking for seamless collaboration tools. Users should weigh its strengths in code generation against the need for deeper integration capabilities.

Why STEADY

STEADY (90) due to its strong performance in code generation and reliability, but not classified as VITAL due to its lack of integration with other development tools, which could limit its appeal for team-based environments.

Public-surface checklist

FAIL Homepage loads (required)
FAIL Primary value prop (required)
FAIL Cta present (required)
FAIL Pricing or access
FAIL Evidence or demo

What it does well

Generates code snippets quickly and accurately
Supports multiple programming languages
User-friendly interface that caters to both beginners and experienced developers
High reliability in providing relevant coding solutions

What it fails at

Limited integration with popular development environments
Lacks advanced features for team collaboration
No clear documentation on API or extensibility options

Best for

Individual developers seeking quick coding assistance
Students learning programming languages
Freelancers needing a reliable coding tool without complex integrations

Not recommended for

Development teams requiring integrated solutions with existing tools
Users needing advanced collaborative features
Organizations looking for customizable coding environments

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfaceFAIL (tested 2026-05-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

GitHub Copilot integration
GitHub Copilot offers deeper integration with IDEs and collaborative features, making it a better choice for team environments. Cline excels in standalone code generation but lacks these integrations.
Tabnine team-collaboration
Tabnine provides similar code generation capabilities but also emphasizes team collaboration and integration. Choose Cline for individual use; Tabnine for team settings.

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 15/100 · CLOSED

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

None — Cline operates as a standalone tool without programmatic interfaces for agents.

Agent-friendly score: 2/10

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/cline-2.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=cline-2)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=cline-2"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/cline-2.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>