What did Hlido score Driven?

Driven scored 74/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Driven

Name: Driven review
Item: Driven
Rating: 74
Author: Hlido Editor

Specialized verticals · tested 2026-09-27 · re-test due 2026-12-27 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A coherent, transparently-priced AI investment agent with broad market coverage — but its autonomous-execution headline is still aspirational and its trust claims lean on unverifiable social proof.

4 PASS · 1 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Driven → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Driven scores 74/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-09-27). STEADY (74) because the product is coherent, feature-rich and unusually transparent on price and limits, with better-than-average risk and legal disclosure for a finance agent. Pricing: Subscription.

Hlido Editor · 2026-09-27

Driven (by Snowball Wealth Private Limited) is a hosted investment agent that wraps 260+ investment data APIs, multiple frontier models (Claude, GPT, Gemini), and a 'Skills' layer — professional methodologies like Buffett and Markowitz plus a user-created Skill Store — into a conversational research-to-execution workflow. The scope is genuinely broad: US, Hong Kong and A-share equities, screeners, financial statements and DCF scenarios, 13F and insider flows, options and volatility signals, and catalyst tracking. Pricing is a real strength — four clearly-bounded tiers ($0 Free / $20 Pro / $100 Max / $200 Ultra) with explicit agent, task, portfolio and storage limits, which is more honest than most agents in this class. The legal hygiene is above average too: a dedicated Risk Disclosure, and an FAQ that directly addresses investment-advice status, data protection and 'Can the AI make mistakes?'. Two things hold it back on the public surface. First, the flagship 'autonomous execution' promise is still forward-looking — the page says 'Paper trading now. Live trading coming soon,' so the trade-execution capability is not yet shipped. Second, the trust signals — 'trusted by portfolio managers overseeing $500M+ in assets' and a wall of pseudonymous Twitter-handle testimonials — are unverifiable from the public surface. In a domain where errors cost real money, those are the claims we most want proof for and have the least. This is a capable, well-documented product to try, not yet a verified autonomous trader.

Why STEADY

STEADY (74) because the product is coherent, feature-rich and unusually transparent on price and limits, with better-than-average risk and legal disclosure for a finance agent. It is not scored higher because this is a public-surface review with no hands-on behavioral run (medium confidence), the flagship live-trading execution is explicitly 'coming soon' rather than shipped, and the headline trust claims ($500M+ AUM, testimonials) are unverifiable pseudonymous social proof in a high-stakes domain.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Your Investment Team, Driven by You.'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'Try Driven Free' / 'Get Started'
PASS Pricing or access — Four transparent tiers: Free $0, Pro $20, Max $100, Ultra $200/mo with stated limits
FAIL Evidence or demo — Social proof is pseudonymous testimonials and an unverifiable $500M+ AUM claim; no live demo or named references on the surface

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-1f9a879788580646-driven-ai). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Driven — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

Driven — run screenshot 2 (page_.png) — page_.png

Driven — run screenshot 3 (page_pricing.png) — page_pricing.png

Driven — run screenshot 4 (page_whats-new.png) — page_whats-new.png

What it does well

Transparent, well-bounded pricing — four tiers with explicit agent, scheduled-task, portfolio and storage limits stated on the page
Broad, specific market coverage: US, Hong Kong and A-share equities plus ETFs, options, macro, crypto, FX and commodities via 260+ data APIs
Multi-model by default (Claude, GPT, Gemini and more) rather than locking users to one provider
Extensibility via 'Skills' — professional methodologies (Buffett, Markowitz) plus a user-created Skill Store
Above-average risk hygiene: dedicated Risk Disclosure and an FAQ that addresses investment-advice status, data protection and AI error

What it fails at

The flagship autonomous-execution promise is aspirational — the page states 'Paper trading now. Live trading coming soon,' so live trade execution is not yet available
Headline trust claim ('trusted by portfolio managers overseeing $500M+ in assets') is unverifiable from the public surface
Testimonials are pseudonymous social-media handles, repeated multiple times in the page, offering weak independent proof
No evidence of a public API, CLI, MCP server, SDK or webhook for external agents to drive Driven — it is an end-user web product (the 260+ APIs are consumed, not exposed)
Marketing jargon ('The OpenClaw Experience') is undefined on the surface, obscuring what is actually delivered

Red flags

Autonomous-execution positioning is prominent while the page simultaneously states live trading is not yet available — a capability-versus-marketing gap buyers should weigh in a high-stakes financial domain.
The primary social-proof claim ($500M+ AUM 'already trusted') and the testimonial wall are unverifiable from the public surface.

Best for

Individual investors researching US, Hong Kong and A-share equities who want one conversational surface instead of many tabs
Users who want a paper-trading and research assistant with transparent, capped pricing before committing spend
People who value multi-model access (Claude/GPT/Gemini) in one investment-focused tool
Investors who want methodology-based 'Skills' (e.g. valuation, screening) rather than a generic chatbot

Not recommended for

Anyone needing live, automated order execution today — that capability is marked 'coming soon'
Buyers who require verifiable, named references before trusting a tool with financial decisions
Developers/agents wanting to integrate Driven programmatically — no public agent-facing API/MCP surface is evidenced
Users seeking regulated investment advice (the product itself signals it is not that — see its Risk Disclosure)
Risk-averse users uncomfortable with an AI acting on markets given the product's own 'Can the AI make mistakes?' caveat

Pricing & access

ModelSubscription
Price points we recorded…tracking. Pricing is a real strength — four clearly-bounded tiers ($0 Free / $20 Pro / $100 Max / $200 Ultra) with explicit agent, task, portfolio and storage… Pricing is four transparent tiers: Free $0/mo, Pro $20/mo, Max $100/mo, Ultra $200/mo, with explicit usage/agent/portfolio/storage limits
Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Four transparent tiers: Free $0, Pro $20, Max $100, Ultra $200/mo with stated limits (tested 2026-08-31)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-31.

Related agents

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

None evidenced for external agents. Driven is an end-user hosted web product: it internally consumes 260+ investment data APIs and orchestrates its own agents, but the public surface shows no API, CLI, MCP server, SDK or webhook that a third-party agent could call to drive Driven. A 'Docs' link exists in the footer but no developer/programmatic integration surface is confirmed from the capture. It is a product to use, not a component an agent integrates with.

Agent-friendly score: 3/10

Evidence

Positions as an AI investment agent: 'Your agents handle the work - research, monitor, strategy building, trade, and more. You make the calls.' — source (2026-09-27) verified
Pricing is four transparent tiers: Free $0/mo, Pro $20/mo, Max $100/mo, Ultra $200/mo, with explicit usage/agent/portfolio/storage limits — source (2026-09-27) verified
Live trade execution not yet shipped: 'Paper trading now. Live trading coming soon.' — source (2026-09-27) verified
'Already trusted by portfolio managers overseeing $500M+ in assets, and the engineers building frontier AI.' — source (2026-09-27)
Operated by SNOWBALL WEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED with Terms, Privacy Policy and a Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer published — source (2026-09-27) verified

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-2+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.09 · Next review due 2026-12-27

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/driven.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=driven)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=driven"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/driven.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>