What did Hlido score Fellow?

Fellow scored 78/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Fellow

Name: Fellow review
Item: Fellow
Rating: 78
Author: Hlido Editor

Productivity · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Solid meeting productivity tool with collaborative features — effective for teams but lacks advanced integrations.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Fellow → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Fellow scores 78/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). STEADY (78) due to its reliable functionality and positive user feedback, but not VITAL because it lacks advanced integrations that could enhance its appeal in a competitive productivity landscape.

Hlido Editor · 2026-05-23

Fellow is a productivity tool designed to enhance meeting efficiency through collaborative agendas and notes. Its core strengths lie in its user-friendly interface and features that support team collaboration, such as shared agendas and feedback loops. However, while it serves its purpose well for team-based environments, it falls short in terms of advanced integrations with other productivity tools, which can limit its utility for users seeking a more interconnected workflow. Overall, Fellow is a dependable choice for teams looking to streamline their meeting processes, but those requiring extensive integrations may want to explore alternatives.

Why STEADY

STEADY (78) due to its reliable functionality and positive user feedback, but not VITAL because it lacks advanced integrations that could enhance its appeal in a competitive productivity landscape.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Meeting productivity tool'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'Get Started'
PASS Pricing or access — /pricing transparent tiers
PASS Evidence or demo — Features outlined on /features

What it does well

User-friendly interface that simplifies meeting management
Facilitates team collaboration with shared agendas and notes
Encourages feedback and follow-ups to improve meeting outcomes

What it fails at

Limited integrations with other productivity tools
Lacks advanced features found in more comprehensive platforms

Best for

Teams looking for a straightforward tool to manage meetings
Organizations focused on improving collaboration and feedback
Users who prioritize ease of use over extensive functionality

Not recommended for

Users needing deep integrations with other software
Individuals or teams with complex meeting requirements
Organizations seeking a comprehensive project management solution

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS /pricing transparent tiers (tested 2026-05-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

Notion integration-capabilities
Notion offers a more comprehensive workspace with advanced integrations and customization options. Choose Fellow for a focused meeting tool; choose Notion for a versatile productivity suite.
Slack communication
Slack provides real-time communication and collaboration features that can complement meeting tools like Fellow. Choose Fellow for structured meeting management; choose Slack for ongoing team communication.

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 34/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

None — Fellow focuses on meeting management without programmatic interfaces for agent integration.

Agent-friendly score: 2/10

Evidence

User-friendly interface — source (2026-05-23) verified
Facilitates team collaboration — source (2026-05-23) verified

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/fellow-app.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=fellow-app)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=fellow-app"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/fellow-app.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>