What did Hlido score Kronos (CoinOpAI)?

Kronos (CoinOpAI) scored 71/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

How much does Kronos (CoinOpAI) cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Usage-based. From our review: Per-endpoint pricing from $0.005 to $0.25, paid via x402 on Base mainnet Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Kronos (CoinOpAI)

Name: Kronos (CoinOpAI) review
Item: Kronos (CoinOpAI)
Rating: 71
Author: Hlido Editor

Specialized verticals · tested 2026-08-05 · re-test due 2026-11-05 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A pay-per-call market-context API for agents that repeatedly refuses to be a trading signal — the disclaimers are the most credible thing on the page.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Kronos (CoinOpAI) → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Kronos (CoinOpAI) scores 71/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-05). STEADY (71) for disciplined scoping and genuine agent-readiness: a calibrated range rather than a direction call, an explicit non-oracle disclaimer repeated where it matters, a verifiable preflight→decision→audit loop, p Pricing: Usage-based.

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-05

Kronos sells structured crypto-market context to agents over x402 on Base mainnet: a conformally-calibrated 80% price range, a risk/cooldown state, a decision journal that returns a decision_id, and an audit endpoint that later checks the outcome against real prices. The product's own framing does the heavy lifting on credibility. It says outright that Kronos is not a buy/sell oracle, repeats twice that directional values are supporting context rather than trade instructions, and organises the whole loop around verification — preflight, decision, audit — under the line "trust the process less, verify the record more". In a category built on implied certainty, an API whose central feature is a calibrated interval and an auditable record is a meaningfully better design. The agent-readiness is also concrete: per-endpoint pricing down to half a cent, a published OpenAPI document, and an llms.txt. The reservations are real. Calibration is asserted ("~0.80 empirical coverage") with no published backtest, sample size, or period; there is no named team, track record, or third-party validation; the operator bundles an unrelated image-generation endpoint and 819 automation prompts, which muddies the focus; and the underlying domain is one where confident-sounding numbers cause real financial loss even when hedged well. Reviewed from the public surface only — we did not pay for a call.

Why STEADY

STEADY (71) for disciplined scoping and genuine agent-readiness: a calibrated range rather than a direction call, an explicit non-oracle disclaimer repeated where it matters, a verifiable preflight→decision→audit loop, per-endpoint pricing to the half-cent, plus OpenAPI and llms.txt. Held below VITAL because the calibration claim is published without any backtest, sample size or period, there is no named team or track record, and the surface mixes in unrelated image-generation and prompt-catalogue endpoints.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Calibrated forecast ranges, risk context, and auditable decision records.'
PASS Cta present (required) — OpenAPI and llms.txt links plus copy-ready curl examples
PASS Pricing or access — Full per-endpoint price table, $0.005–$0.25 per call
PASS Evidence or demo — Sample responses and a documented verification loop; no backtest or third-party validation

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-1a0dd38cc879b484-x402-coinopai-com). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Kronos (CoinOpAI) — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

Kronos (CoinOpAI) — run screenshot 2 (page_openapi_json.png) — page_openapi_json.png

Kronos (CoinOpAI) — run screenshot 3 (page_llms_txt.png) — page_llms_txt.png

Kronos (CoinOpAI) — run screenshot 4 (page_api_categories.png) — page_api_categories.png

What it does well

Leads with a calibrated 80% interval and risk state rather than a directional buy/sell call
States plainly that it is not a buy/sell oracle, and repeats that directional values are not trade instructions
Auditable loop by design — preflight, decision journal with a decision_id, then outcome verification against later prices
Per-endpoint pricing published to the half-cent, so an agent can budget before calling
Machine-readable surface: OpenAPI document and llms.txt both published and linked
x402 pay-per-call on Base mainnet — no account, no subscription, agent-native payment

What it fails at

The ~0.80 empirical coverage claim is published with no backtest, sample size, time period, or methodology
No named team, operating history, or third-party validation anywhere on the surface
Focus is diluted by unrelated bundled endpoints (AI image generation, 819 automation prompts, 115 platforms)
Crypto market forecasting is a domain where even well-hedged outputs can drive real financial loss
Data freshness is surfaced as a field but no uptime, latency or availability record is published
Not tested — we did not purchase a call, so the response quality behind the pricing table is unverified

Red flags

[object Object]

Best for

Agent developers who want structured, auditable market context rather than a signal to act on
Systems that need a decision journal and later outcome verification for compliance or post-mortem
x402-native agents that must pay per call without an account relationship

Not recommended for

Anyone seeking trading signals or investment advice — the vendor says this is not that, and neither do we
Buyers who need published calibration evidence before relying on an interval
Use cases requiring an availability guarantee or an identifiable, accountable operator

Pricing & access

ModelUsage-based
Price points we recordedPer-endpoint pricing from $0.005 to $0.25, paid via x402 on Base mainnet
Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Full per-endpoint price table, $0.005–$0.25 per call (tested 2026-08-04)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-04.

Related agents

Agent relevance

API MCP Behavioral-testable

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 71/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Agent-native end to end: x402 pay-per-call means no account or key exchange, OpenAPI plus llms.txt make the surface machine-discoverable, and the decision/audit endpoints exist so an agent can journal and later verify its own reasoning.

Agent-friendly score: 9/10

Evidence

Conformally-calibrated 80% price range as the primary output — source (2026-08-05) verified
Explicit statement that Kronos is not a buy/sell oracle and directional values are not trade instructions — source (2026-08-05) verified
Verifiable loop: /api/kronos/preflight → /decision (decision_id) → /audit against later prices — source (2026-08-05) verified
Per-endpoint pricing from $0.005 to $0.25, paid via x402 on Base mainnet — source (2026-08-05) verified
OpenAPI document and llms.txt published for machine consumption — source (2026-08-05) verified
~0.80 empirical coverage of the calibrated range — source (2026-08-05)

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-11-05

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/forgemeshlabs-coinopai-mcp.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=forgemeshlabs-coinopai-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=forgemeshlabs-coinopai-mcp"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/forgemeshlabs-coinopai-mcp.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>