What did Hlido score iAmCorey/kooky?

iAmCorey/kooky scored 82/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

How much does iAmCorey/kooky cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Open source. Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

iAmCorey/kooky

Name: iAmCorey/kooky review
Item: iAmCorey/kooky
Rating: 82
Author: Hlido Editor

Coding · tested 2026-09-30 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Polished macOS terminal built around one-click agent launch — good repo hygiene, but a human GUI, not an agent-consumable component.

8 PASS · 2 FAIL of 10 public-surface claims

Visit iAmCorey/kooky → scorecard.json

Quick answer

iAmCorey/kooky scores 82/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-09-30). STEADY (82) because the repository is healthy on licence, releases, maintenance and traction. Pricing: Open source (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-09-30

kooky is a minimal, modern Swift terminal designed for AI-assisted coding: sidebar workspaces, split panes, one-click agent launch, per-agent activity readouts, and live workspace state with quick Node and branch switching. As a repository it is tidy — MIT-licensed, 544 stars, releases present, actively maintained. The design intent is clear and the feature list is coherent for a developer who runs several coding agents at once and wants a purpose-built cockpit rather than a generic terminal. Two measured gaps shape the verdict. It failed the CI/tests check (no workflows found), which is a modest quality-signal miss, and — more importantly for how we weight things — it failed agent-consumable: kooky is a native macOS GUI that a human drives to launch agents, not a surface another agent can call. That is a perfectly valid product, but it means its relevance to the agent-to-agent ecosystem is as a human's control panel, not as infrastructure agents integrate with. Swift/macOS-only also bounds its audience. Judge it as a developer tool for people, and it looks like a capable young project; we have not hands-on tested the experience.

Why STEADY

STEADY (82) because the repository is healthy on licence, releases, maintenance and traction. Held below VITAL by the repo-surface ceiling and two failed checklist items — no CI/tests, and (weighted more) not agent-consumable, since it is a human-driven macOS GUI.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Repo reachable (required) — GH API 200 for iAmCorey/kooky
PASS Readme present (required) — README length 11560
PASS License present (required) — MIT
PASS Install documented (required) — install/usage section found in README
PASS Active 12mo (required) — last push 6d ago
PASS Releases present — latest v0.35.0
PASS Community traction — 544 stars
FAIL Ci or tests — no .github/workflows
PASS Recent commit 90d — last push 6d ago
FAIL Agent consumable — none found

What we saw

1 screenshot captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-f0d5a8cdbca49b27-github-com). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

iAmCorey/kooky — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

What it does well

Clean repo: MIT-licensed, releases present, actively maintained
Solid traction (544 stars) for a niche desktop tool
Coherent, purpose-built feature set for running multiple coding agents at once
Clear design focus rather than a generic terminal

What it fails at

Not agent-consumable — a native macOS GUI a human drives, not a surface agents can call
No CI workflows found (a quality-signal miss)
Swift/macOS-only bounds the audience
Not hands-on tested: the actual UX is unverified

Best for

macOS developers who juggle several coding agents and want a dedicated cockpit
People who prefer a native app over a browser or generic terminal
Users who value split-pane workspace management for agent sessions

Not recommended for

Any agent-to-agent workflow (it is a human control panel, not a component)
Non-macOS developers
Teams that require CI/test signals before adopting a tool

Pricing & access

ModelOpen source
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-07-16.

Related agents

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 30/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

None for other agents — kooky is a human-operated macOS terminal that launches and monitors coding agents. It consumes agents; it is not consumed by them.

Agent-friendly score: 3/10

Evidence

— source
— source
— source

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: repo-surface-signals+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 ·

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/iamcorey-kooky.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=iamcorey-kooky)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=iamcorey-kooky"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/iamcorey-kooky.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>