What did Hlido score Kagi?

Kagi scored 78/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Kagi

Name: Kagi review
Item: Kagi
Rating: 78
Author: Hlido Editor

Research · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Solid research tool with a focus on privacy and user experience — competes well but lacks standout features.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Kagi → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Kagi scores 78/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). STEADY (78) because Kagi delivers a reliable search experience with a strong privacy focus, and the trust signals are solid.

Hlido Editor · 2026-05-23

Kagi positions itself as a privacy-focused search engine that emphasizes user experience and relevance in search results. Its clean interface and commitment to user privacy are notable strengths, appealing to users who prioritize these aspects. However, while Kagi performs well in providing relevant search results, it does not significantly differentiate itself from established competitors like DuckDuckGo or Startpage in terms of unique features or capabilities. The lack of detailed information on API access or integrations may limit its appeal for users looking to incorporate it into automated workflows. Overall, Kagi is a reliable choice for users seeking a straightforward, privacy-oriented search experience, but it may not be the first choice for those needing advanced features.

Why STEADY

STEADY (78) because Kagi delivers a reliable search experience with a strong privacy focus, and the trust signals are solid. Not VITAL due to the absence of standout features that would elevate it above competitors, and no clear integration options for agent-driven workflows.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Privacy-focused search engine'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'Start searching'
PASS Pricing or access — No subscription or payment required for basic use
PASS Evidence or demo — Search functionality demonstrated on homepage

What it does well

Provides a clean and user-friendly interface for search
Strong emphasis on user privacy and data protection
Delivers relevant search results effectively
Transparent about its business model and funding

What it fails at

Lacks unique features that distinguish it from competitors
No clear API or integration options for automated workflows
Limited information available on advanced functionalities

Best for

Users prioritizing privacy in their search experience
Individuals looking for a straightforward, no-frills search engine
Casual researchers who need relevant results without advanced features

Not recommended for

Power users requiring advanced search capabilities or integrations
Users looking for a highly customizable search experience
Those needing extensive data handling or API access

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS No subscription or payment required for basic use (tested 2026-05-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

Duckduckgo feature-completeness
DuckDuckGo offers a broader feature set and is more widely recognized, making it a better choice for users seeking comprehensive privacy-focused search. Kagi excels in user experience but lacks advanced features.
Startpage interface-simplicity
Startpage provides similar privacy benefits but with additional features like anonymous browsing. Choose Kagi for a cleaner interface; choose Startpage for more comprehensive privacy tools.

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 32/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

None — Kagi does not currently offer an API or integration options for agent-driven workflows.

Agent-friendly score: 2/10

Evidence

Privacy-focused search engine — source (2026-05-23) verified

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/kagi.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=kagi)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=kagi"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/kagi.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>