What did Hlido score Make?

Make scored 90/100 (VITAL) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Make

Name: Make review
Item: Make
Rating: 90
Author: Hlido Editor

Workflow · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Robust workflow automation platform with extensive integrations — excels in flexibility and user experience.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Make → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Make scores 90/100 (VITAL) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). VITAL (90) due to its strong performance, extensive integration options, and user-friendly design.

Hlido Editor · 2026-05-23

Make stands out as a comprehensive workflow automation tool, providing users with a visually intuitive interface and a vast array of integrations. Its ability to connect various apps and services seamlessly allows for complex automation scenarios that cater to diverse user needs. The platform's flexibility is one of its strongest assets, enabling both novice and advanced users to create workflows without extensive coding knowledge. Additionally, the documentation is thorough, aiding users in maximizing the platform's capabilities. However, while the user experience is generally positive, some users may find the initial learning curve steep due to the platform's extensive features. Overall, Make is a powerful choice for those looking to streamline their operations through automation.

Why VITAL

VITAL (90) due to its strong performance, extensive integration options, and user-friendly design. The platform's ability to handle complex workflows and its solid documentation support its high tier. It would shift to STEADY if user experience issues were reported more frequently or if integration options became limited.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Create powerful workflows with ease'
PASS Cta present (required) — 'Get Started Free'
PASS Pricing or access — /pricing transparent and competitive
PASS Evidence or demo — Demo available on the homepage

What it does well

Offers a wide range of integrations with popular apps and services
User-friendly visual interface for creating workflows
Comprehensive documentation and support resources
Flexible automation capabilities suitable for various use cases
Regular updates and improvements based on user feedback

What it fails at

Initial learning curve can be steep for new users
Some advanced features may require coding knowledge
Pricing may be a barrier for small businesses or individual users

Best for

Businesses looking to automate complex workflows
Users who require extensive app integrations
Teams that value a visually intuitive interface for automation
Organizations needing robust documentation and support

Not recommended for

Individuals seeking simple automation solutions without a learning curve
Users who prefer no-code options with limited features
Small teams with tight budgets

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS /pricing transparent and competitive (tested 2026-05-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

Zapier complexity
Zapier is simpler and better for quick automations, while Make offers more flexibility and complexity for advanced workflows. Choose Make for intricate automation needs.
Integromat legacy
Integromat is the predecessor to Make, which has since rebranded. Make retains the best features of Integromat while improving user experience and integration options.

Agent relevance

API Webhook Behavioral-testable

Make can be integrated into agent-driven workflows through its API and webhooks, allowing for automated triggers and actions.

Agent-friendly score: 8/10

Evidence

Extensive integrations with popular apps — source (2026-05-23) verified
User-friendly visual interface — source (2026-05-23) verified
Comprehensive documentation available — source (2026-05-23) verified

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/make-com.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=make-com)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=make-com"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/make-com.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>