What did Hlido score Maritime?

Maritime scored 75/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Maritime

Name: Maritime review
Item: Maritime
Rating: 75
Author: Hlido Editor

Infrastructure · tested 2026-08-31 · re-test due 2026-11-29 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Agent-first hosting that gives every agent its own micro-VM at a flat $1/month — a genuinely differentiated infra bet, still early and self-benchmarked.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Maritime → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Maritime scores 75/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-31). STEADY (75) on a clear, differentiated value proposition (per-agent micro-VM isolation), transparent flat pricing, and a genuinely agent-first control surface (non-interactive CLI + typed SDKs + webhooks). Pricing: Usage-based · Subscription.

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-31

Maritime is infrastructure built for one specific shape of demand: running many isolated AI agents cheaply, one hardware-isolated micro-VM per agent rather than threads in a shared runtime. The pitch is unusually concrete for this category — a non-interactive CLI (so your own agents can provision agents), typed TypeScript and Python SDKs, lifecycle webhooks, encrypted per-VM secrets, sleep/wake in about a second, and a flat $1-per-agent-per-month price with nothing metered. That combination — hard isolation plus flat, legible pricing plus an agent-provisionable CLI — is a real position, and it is aimed squarely at the emerging pattern of shipping a dedicated agent per end-customer. Where to stay skeptical: the headline comparison table against E2B, Modal, Fly.io and others is vendor-authored and should be treated as a claim, not a benchmark; 'no cold starts / ~1s wake' and the isolation guarantees are exactly the things that need independent measurement before they are trusted for production; and the company is young with limited public track record. As a component in an agent stack this scores well because it is designed to be driven programmatically — but the reliability claims are unverified from the public surface alone.

Why STEADY

STEADY (75) on a clear, differentiated value proposition (per-agent micro-VM isolation), transparent flat pricing, and a genuinely agent-first control surface (non-interactive CLI + typed SDKs + webhooks). Held below higher bands because the review is public-surface only: the isolation and no-cold-start claims are unmeasured, the competitive comparison is self-authored, and the company has a short public track record.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — 'Run a thousand agents as easily as one' — per-agent micro-VM isolation
PASS Cta present (required) — 'Start free' / 'Book a demo'
PASS Pricing or access — Transparent flat tiers Free/$20/$100/$500/Custom + $1/agent
PASS Evidence or demo — Live dashboard URL example + comparison table (vendor-authored)

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-f8712cd20e309b66-maritime-sh). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Maritime — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

Maritime — run screenshot 2 (page_.png) — page_.png

Maritime — run screenshot 3 (page_pricing.png) — page_pricing.png

Maritime — run screenshot 4 (page_docs.png) — page_docs.png

What it does well

One hardware-isolated micro-VM per agent — a clear, defensible isolation model over shared-runtime rivals
Flat, legible pricing ($1/agent/month, nothing metered) that is easy to reason about at scale
Agent-first control surface: a fully non-interactive CLI so agents can provision agents, plus typed TS/Python SDKs and REST
Lifecycle webhooks (deploy/sleep/wake/fail) and per-VM encrypted secrets
Migration paths advertised from E2B, LangGraph and other platforms, plus SSH access and exportable state (low lock-in posture)

What it fails at

The headline performance/isolation claims (no cold starts, ~1s wake, hard boundaries) are unmeasured on the public surface
The side-by-side comparison table against competitors is vendor-authored — a marketing claim, not an independent benchmark
Short public track record; no third-party reliability or security evidence visible
No public status/SLA or incident history surfaced from the homepage

Red flags

Competitive comparison table is self-published and should not be read as an independent benchmark

Best for

Startups selling a dedicated AI agent per end-customer that need hard per-tenant isolation
Teams that want their own agents to programmatically provision and tear down agent runtimes
Cost-sensitive workloads where flat per-agent pricing beats metered compute

Not recommended for

Workloads needing a proven, long-standing reliability/SLA track record today
Buyers who need the isolation and cold-start claims independently verified before adoption
Single-agent hobby use where a generic PaaS is simpler

Pricing & access

ModelUsage-based · Subscription
Price points we recordedAgent-first hosting that gives every agent its own micro-VM at a flat $1/month — a genuinely differentiated infra bet, still early and self-benchmarked.
Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Transparent flat tiers Free/$20/$100/$500/Custom + $1/agent (tested 2026-08-31)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-31.

Related agents

Agent relevance

API CLI Webhook SDK

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 59/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Strong: Maritime is designed to be driven programmatically — a non-interactive CLI plus typed TS/Python SDKs and REST let an agent provision, wake, and tear down agent runtimes. Not behaviourally tested by Hlido from the public surface.

Agent-friendly score: 8/10

Evidence

One isolated micro-VM per agent, provisioned from your backend — source (2026-08-31) verified
Flat pricing at $1 per agent per month, nothing metered — source (2026-08-31) verified
Non-interactive CLI + TypeScript/Python SDKs + REST — source (2026-08-31) verified
No cold starts / ~1s wake from sleep — source (2026-08-31)

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-11-29

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/maritime.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=maritime)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=maritime"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/maritime.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>