What did Hlido score Narcooo/inkos?

Narcooo/inkos scored 80/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Is Narcooo/inkos reliable?

Narcooo/inkos is rated STEADY (80/100) by Hlido. Narcooo/inkos — Story Creation AI Agent for novel, scripts, translation, interactive games, and IP content. Repo-surface review: measured from the public repository (8023 stars, AGPL-3.0, last push 2026-07-16); not hands-on tested.

How much does Narcooo/inkos cost?

Hlido recorded the pricing model as: Open source. Derived from evidence Hlido holds, not vendor-supplied; verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Narcooo/inkos

Name: Narcooo/inkos review
Item: Narcooo/inkos
Rating: 80
Author: Hlido Editor

AI Agent · tested 2026-07-23 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A fast-moving, heavily-starred story-creation agent — real momentum and releases, but missing install docs and carrying a heavy issue backlog under an AGPL license.

8 PASS · 2 FAIL of 10 public-surface claims

Visit Narcooo/inkos → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Narcooo/inkos scores 80/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-07-23). STEADY (80). Pricing: Open source (free entry point documented).

Hlido Editor · 2026-07-23

The momentum here is genuine: 8k stars, a v1.7.0 release and a push on the very day the repository was measured. It is AGPL-3.0, TypeScript, with CI present, and its creative scope is broad — novels, scripts, translation, interactive games and IP content. Two honest cautions surface from the repository. The README lacks clear install/usage markers, which is a real onboarding gap for a project this popular, and 205 open issues is a large backlog to weigh against the fast release cadence. AGPL-3.0 is the licensing consideration for any commercial embedding. Repo-surface read; output quality was not tested hands-on.

Why STEADY

STEADY (80). Strong traction, active maintenance, CI and a real release cadence clear STEADY. VITAL is withheld because onboarding docs are missing, the open-issue backlog is heavy, and no agent-consumable interface or hands-on quality signal is present.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Repo reachable (required) — GH API 200 for Narcooo/inkos
PASS Readme present (required) — README length 29638
PASS License present (required) — AGPL-3.0
FAIL Install documented (required) — no install/usage markers
PASS Active 12mo (required) — last push 0d ago
PASS Releases present — latest v1.7.0
PASS Community traction — 8023 stars
PASS Ci or tests — 2 workflow file(s)
PASS Recent commit 90d — last push 0d ago
FAIL Agent consumable — none found

What we saw

1 screenshot captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-e3514c9bb1c5d267-github-com). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Narcooo/inkos — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

What it does well

Very active — a push the same day it was measured — with tagged releases (v1.7.0)
Strong traction (8k stars) and CI present
Broad creative scope (novels, scripts, translation, games, IP content)

What it fails at

No clear install/usage documentation in the README — an onboarding gap
205 open issues — a heavy backlog against the release cadence
AGPL-3.0 copyleft complicates commercial embedding
Not exposed as an agent-consumable API; output quality unverified

Best for

Writers and creators wanting an AI story-creation tool
AGPL-compatible open-source projects

Not recommended for

Closed commercial embedding wary of AGPL copyleft
Teams needing turnkey install and support
Agent pipelines needing a programmatic interface

Pricing & access

ModelOpen source
Free entry pointYes — a free tier or open-source edition is documented

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-07-16.

Related agents

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 25/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

A story-creation agent with no documented programmatic surface for agent consumption at the repository level. No hands-on behavioral test performed.

Agent-friendly score: 3/10

Evidence

— source
— source
— source

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: repo-surface-track+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 ·

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/narcooo-inkos.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=narcooo-inkos)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=narcooo-inkos"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/narcooo-inkos.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>