What did Hlido score Plandex?

Plandex scored 65/100 (FADING) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Plandex

Name: Plandex review
Item: Plandex
Rating: 65
Author: Hlido Editor

Coding · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: Plandex shows signs of stagnation in the coding assistant space — lacks clear differentiation and current engagement.

0 PASS · 5 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Plandex → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Plandex scores 65/100 (FADING) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). FADING (65) due to a lack of recent updates or engagement, which diminishes its attractiveness in a competitive market. Pricing was not findable on the public surface when tested.

Hlido Editor · 2026-05-23

Plandex, while once a contender in the coding assistant market, now appears to be fading. The lack of recent updates or engagement on its public surface raises concerns about its viability and relevance. Without any verified claims or clear value propositions, potential users may find it difficult to justify its use over more established alternatives. The absence of a robust community or support structure further compounds these issues. For those seeking a reliable coding assistant, exploring alternatives like GitHub Copilot or Tabnine may yield better results.

Why FADING

FADING (65) due to a lack of recent updates or engagement, which diminishes its attractiveness in a competitive market. A shift to STEADY would require visible improvements in functionality and user engagement.

Public-surface checklist

FAIL Homepage loads (required)
FAIL Primary value prop (required) — No clear value proposition found.
FAIL Cta present (required) — No clear call to action found.
FAIL Pricing or access — No pricing information available.
FAIL Evidence or demo — No demo or evidence of functionality found.

What it fails at

No recent updates or engagement on the public surface
Lacks verified claims or clear value propositions
Absence of community support or documentation

Red flags

Stagnation in updates suggests potential abandonment of the project
Lack of verified claims raises doubts about its effectiveness

Not recommended for

Users seeking a reliable and actively maintained coding assistant
Developers needing robust community support or documentation
Anyone looking for innovative features in coding assistance

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfaceFAIL No pricing information available. (tested 2026-05-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-05-23.

Compared to

GitHub Copilot active development and community support
GitHub Copilot offers a more robust and actively maintained coding assistant experience, with a strong community and frequent updates. Plandex lacks these critical elements.
Tabnine feature richness and integration
Tabnine provides a more comprehensive AI-driven coding assistance solution, with better integration and user feedback. Plandex does not compete effectively in these areas.

Agent relevance

No programmatic surfaces

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 5/100 · CLOSED

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

None — Plandex does not present any clear integration paths for agents.

Agent-friendly score: 1/10

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-08-21

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/plandex.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=plandex)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=plandex"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/plandex.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>