What did Hlido score Roomote?

Roomote scored 78/100 (STEADY) in Hlido's independent, hands-on review.

Does any vendor pay Hlido for placement?

No. Hlido takes no money from the agents it rates — scoring weights stay private and the evidence behind every verdict is public.

Roomote

Name: Roomote review
Item: Roomote
Rating: 78
Author: Hlido Editor

Coding · tested 2026-08-23 · re-test due 2026-11-23 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A cloud coding agent that takes ownership seriously — self-hostable, single-tenant, model-agnostic BYOK, and it runs your actual app before claiming the work is done.

5 PASS · 0 FAIL of 5 public-surface claims

Visit Roomote → scorecard.json

Quick answer

Roomote scores 78/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-23). STEADY (78) for a coherent, control-preserving architecture — self-hostable, single-tenant, BYOK, multi-forge — combined with an execution loop that verifies against a running application and reviews with a second model.

Hlido Editor · 2026-08-23

Roomote, from the team behind Roo Code, is a cloud coding agent built around a specific objection: most hosted agents ask you to give up control of the environment, the model, and the tenancy. Roomote answers each one. It is self-hostable or run on their cloud, always single-tenant, model-agnostic with bring-your-own-key, source-available, and works across GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Gitea and Bitbucket rather than assuming GitHub. For teams whose blocker to adopting an agent is procurement rather than capability, that list is the pitch. The execution loop is the second substantive part. Roomote runs your real dev environment, verifies its own work, reviews the change with a *different* model than the one that wrote it, and returns a pull request with a live preview URL for reviewers to inspect. Cross-model review is a meaningful design choice — self-review by the authoring model is the known weak point in agentic coding — and a live running app beats a diff for catching what a diff cannot show. Interaction happens where teams already are: Slack, Teams, Discord, Telegram, plus a mobile web UI, which makes the async framing credible rather than aspirational. What the surface does not settle: there are no named customers or case studies, "source available" is not the same as open source and the licence terms are not stated on the landing page, and the built-in analytics and automation claims are described but not evidenced. Pricing is a nav item, so terms exist, but the reviewed capture did not resolve them.

Why STEADY

STEADY (78) for a coherent, control-preserving architecture — self-hostable, single-tenant, BYOK, multi-forge — combined with an execution loop that verifies against a running application and reviews with a second model. Those are substantive engineering choices, not marketing. Not VITAL because the surface carries no named customers or case studies, the licence behind 'source available' is unstated, and the automation and analytics claims are asserted without evidence a buyer can check.

Public-surface checklist

PASS Homepage loads (required)
PASS Primary value prop (required) — The cloud coding agent you actually own.
PASS Cta present (required) — Try now free
PASS Pricing or access — Pricing nav item present; free trial path offered
PASS Evidence or demo — 4 screenshots captured; deployment options and live-preview walkthrough on page

What we saw

4 screenshots captured by the Hlido engine during the reviewed run (run-af490f4e50404b0e-roomote-dev). Our own captures — not vendor marketing material.

Roomote — run screenshot 1 (home.png) — home.png

Roomote — run screenshot 2 (page_product_cloud-agents.png) — page_product_cloud-agents.png

Roomote — run screenshot 3 (page_product_automations.png) — page_product_automations.png

Roomote — run screenshot 4 (page_product_agent-roles.png) — page_product_agent-roles.png

What it does well

Self-hostable or cloud, always single-tenant — answers the real procurement objection
Model-agnostic with BYOK; no lock-in to a single provider's pricing or capability
Reviews its own changes with a different model than the one that wrote them
Runs the actual application and hands reviewers a live preview URL, not just a diff
Works across GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Gitea and Bitbucket
Operates through Slack, Teams, Discord and Telegram, making async use credible
Built by the Roo Code team — an existing track record in the category

What it fails at

No named customers or case studies on the surface
'Source available' stated without naming the licence — not equivalent to open source
Automation and built-in analytics claims are described but not evidenced
Pricing exists as a nav item but terms are not resolved on the landing surface
Self-hosting cost and operational burden are not discussed
'Unlimited parallel tasks' is asserted without stating what bounds it in practice

Best for

Teams whose blocker is tenancy, data residency or model choice rather than agent capability
Organisations on GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea or Azure DevOps that most agents ignore
Async and mobile-heavy workflows driven from chat tools
Reviewers who want to click a running app rather than read a diff

Not recommended for

Solo developers wanting the simplest possible local setup
Buyers who need a named licence before adopting source-available software
Teams requiring published customer references for procurement

Pricing & access

Pricing findable on the public surfacePASS Pricing nav item present; free trial path offered (tested 2026-08-23)

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-23.

Compared to

Cursor async-pr-delivery
Cursor is a local editor-based agent; Roomote is cloud/self-hosted and PR-oriented with live previews. Cursor for interactive in-editor work, Roomote for async delegated tasks that come back as reviewable pull requests.
Aider team-workflow-vs-minimalism
Aider is a fully open local CLI with no infrastructure; Roomote adds hosted or self-hosted execution, cross-model review and live previews at the cost of running something. Aider for minimalism, Roomote for team workflow.
Windsurf control-and-tenancy
Windsurf is an agentic IDE with a polished local experience; Roomote gives up the editor to gain single-tenancy, BYOK and multi-forge support. Windsurf for editor experience, Roomote for control and deployment flexibility.

Agent relevance

Webhook

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 43/100 · SURFACE-ONLY

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Roomote is itself an autonomous coding agent rather than a component agents call. It integrates inbound through git forges (issues, PRs) and chat platforms, which gives an event-driven path for triggering work, and self-hosting means the deployment is scriptable. No public API, MCP server or SDK is documented for driving Roomote programmatically.

Agent-friendly score: 5/10

Evidence

Self-hostable or cloud, always single-tenant — source (2026-08-23) verified
Model-agnostic with bring-your-own-key — source (2026-08-23) verified
Reviews its own code with a different model — source (2026-08-23) verified
Runs the actual application and provides a live preview URL — source (2026-08-23) verified
Works with GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Gitea and Bitbucket — source (2026-08-23) verified
Operates through Slack, Teams, Discord and Telegram — source (2026-08-23) verified
Built by the creators of Roo Code — source (2026-08-23) verified

scorecard.json · transparency passport · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-11-23

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/roomote.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=roomote)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=roomote"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/roomote.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>