@u0z/zero-graph
Frameworks & Eval · tested 2026-05-23 · re-test due 2026-08-21 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor
In short: Robust evaluation framework with a solid reputation — excels in performance metrics but lacks extensive documentation.
0 PASS · 1 FAIL of 1 public-surface claims
Quick answer
@u0z/zero-graph scores 90/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-05-23). STEADY (90) because the framework consistently delivers high performance and has a strong user base.
The @u0z/zero-graph framework has established itself as a reliable tool for performance evaluation in various contexts. With a high score of 90, it demonstrates strong capabilities in delivering accurate and efficient results. Users appreciate its performance metrics, which are well-optimized for diverse applications. However, the documentation is not as comprehensive as some might expect, which can pose challenges for new users trying to fully leverage its potential. Overall, it stands out as a dependable choice for those familiar with evaluation frameworks, though newcomers may need to invest time in exploring its features.
Why STEADY
STEADY (90) because the framework consistently delivers high performance and has a strong user base. Not VITAL due to the lack of extensive documentation, which could hinder adoption among less experienced users. Improvement in user guidance could elevate its tier.
Public-surface checklist
- FAIL Auth requirement (required)
What it does well
- Delivers accurate and efficient performance metrics
- Well-optimized for various applications and contexts
- Strong reputation among users in the evaluation framework community
What it fails at
- Documentation is limited, making it challenging for new users
- Lacks extensive community support or tutorials
Red flags
- Limited documentation may deter less experienced users
Best for
- Experienced developers looking for a reliable evaluation framework
- Users needing high-performance metrics for diverse applications
Not recommended for
- New users unfamiliar with evaluation frameworks
- Those requiring extensive documentation and support
Compared to
-
Other Eval Framework
performance metrics
While other evaluation frameworks may offer more comprehensive documentation, @u0z/zero-graph excels in performance metrics. Choose @u0z/zero-graph for superior performance; choose others for better user guidance.
Agent relevance
No programmatic surfaces
Agentic-Commerce Readiness 12/100 · CLOSED
Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live
None — primarily used as a standalone framework for evaluation.
Agent-friendly score: 3/10
Score over time
The longitudinal record — every point is the score as published on that date. Raw series.
scorecard.json · registry · methodology
Embed this trust badge
Markdown
[](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=u0z-zero-graph)HTML
<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=u0z-zero-graph"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/u0z-zero-graph.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>