Agent Manager

Coding · tested 2026-08-18 · re-test due 2026-11-16 · by the Hlido desk, not the vendor

In short: A fast, keyboard-driven control tower for running many coding agents at once — spawn in a sentence, answer a blocked one without attaching, review its diff in place — and it runs your real installed CLIs as-is rather than reimplementing them.

Quick answer

Agent Manager scores 73/100 (STEADY) on Hlido’s independent, hands-on test (reviewed 2026-08-18). STEADY (73) because it delivers a genuinely polished, differentiated workflow for a real emerging need — managing many parallel coding agents from one keyboard-driven list — composes with users' existing CLIs rather than Pricing: Open source (free entry point documented).

Agent Manager is a well-executed answer to a problem that is suddenly real: developers now run five, ten, twenty coding-agent sessions in parallel, and a wall of tmux panes is a poor way to manage them. Built in Go on tmux, Apache-2.0, installable via Homebrew on macOS, Linux and WSL, it turns that fleet into a single navigable list where every action is one keypress — space to spawn an agent from a one-sentence task into the right directory, space again on a session row to answer a blocked agent in place without attaching, ctrl+r to open a full review mode with per-file diffs and inline comments, and worktree spawns for work that needs its own branch. The design decisions are thoughtful: sessions rename themselves once the agent knows the task; folded groups keep per-status counts so a collapsed subtree still tells you if something is blocked on you; state (arrangement, groups, archives) survives restarts. Crucially, each session runs your own installed CLI as-is — your login, your config, your MCP servers — so it composes with Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Grok and others rather than locking you into one. For Claude Code it reads real hook events instead of guessing pane state, which is the right way to detect status. It has genuine early traction (Hacker News, Product Hunt, Trendshift, TLDR). The honest limits are stage-typical: it is a solo, open-source project, terminal-only, tmux- and Unix-centric (no native Windows outside WSL), and there is no independent reliability or scale evidence beyond the launch coverage. As a power-user workflow layer for multi-agent coding, it is polished and clearly differentiated.

Why STEADY

STEADY (73) because it delivers a genuinely polished, differentiated workflow for a real emerging need — managing many parallel coding agents from one keyboard-driven list — composes with users' existing CLIs rather than replacing them, uses real hook events for Claude Code status, and shows early independent traction. Not VITAL because it is a solo open-source project, terminal- and tmux-centric with no native Windows path, and carries no reliability, scale or sustained-adoption evidence beyond launch coverage.

What it does well

What it fails at

Best for

  • Developers running many parallel coding-agent sessions who want one keyboard-driven place to control them
  • Teams mixing multiple agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode) who want each run to keep its own config and MCP servers
  • Power users who want in-place diff review and inline comments without leaving the session list
  • macOS/Linux/WSL users comfortable in a tmux-based terminal workflow

Not recommended for

  • Windows-native users who cannot or will not run under WSL
  • GUI-first developers who prefer an IDE panel over a terminal TUI
  • Buyers who require vendor-backed support and reliability guarantees
  • Single-agent workflows where a fleet manager adds no value

Pricing & access

Derived from Hlido-held evidence only (engine checklist + editorial text); quotes are verbatim from the scorecard; not vendor-supplied; re-derived daily. Verify current prices on the vendor's pricing page. Last verified 2026-08-18.

Compared to

Agent relevance

CLI MCP Behavioral-testable

Agentic-Commerce Readiness 57/100 · INTEGRABLE

Independent readiness for agent delegation & transaction. How it’s scored · check live

Agent Manager is a manager OF agents rather than an agent with a callable surface: it spawns and controls coding-agent CLIs, and exposes MCP tools an agent uses to declare the repo/worktree and merge base it moved into so review-mode targets correctly. It runs Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Grok as-is, preserving each one's own MCP servers. Direct relevance to any multi-agent coding workflow; the value is orchestration, not a drivable API.

Agent-friendly score: 8/10

Evidence

scorecard.json · registry · methodology

More: compare agents · best of · developer tools · incident registry

Verdict by Hlido Editor, our automated editorial system · Method: public-surface-tier-1+editorial-narrative-v2 · Methodology version 2026.05 · Next review due 2026-11-16

How this page was produced. The scores, claim verdicts and evidence come from automated hands-on testing of the product’s public surface. The written analysis is drafted by an AI system, and pages publish without a person reviewing each one. Hlido publishes this record and answers for it — tell us if anything here is wrong and we will correct it.

Embed this trust badge

Hlido trust score

Live, always-current independent score — free to embed on your site or README. No vendor pays for placement.

Markdown

[![Hlido trust score](https://hlido.eu/badge/yoanwai-agent-manager.svg)](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=yoanwai-agent-manager)

HTML

<a href="https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=yoanwai-agent-manager"><img src="https://hlido.eu/badge/yoanwai-agent-manager.svg" alt="Hlido trust score"></a>